What is RSS? | All Feeds






Conventional Folly
Psych Sosh

The art of war and junior girls basketball

by David Adesnik | May 7, 2009
Article Tools
Post a Comment
E-mail this Article
Print This Article
More in Psych Sosh

Malcolm Gladwell has unearthed another gem. It is the story of Vivek Ranadive, an immigrant from Mumbai who founded a software company in Silicon Valley. Mr. Ranadive volunteered to coach his 12-year-old daughter’s basketball team. The girls on her team were not tall, were not good shooters and were not good at handling the ball. Mr. Ranadive had never played basketball before. He took his team all the way to the national championship tournament.

How did he do it? The same way that Lawrence of Arabia defeated the Turks with a handful of bedouins. Just read the story.


3 Comments - add your own

Sonny Bunch — May 8, 2009 at 10:16 am

Man, I was going to do a post on just how silly that article was. Instead, I’ll just point to JVL’s rebuttal.

http://galleyslaves.blogspot.com/2009/05/sailer-puts-press-on-gladwell.html

The Sailer piece he links to is also instructive.

I don’t disagree with the general thrust of Gladwell’s point (that a well-planned surprise is a massive underdog’s best chance of winning), but using the full court press in basketball is a terrible way to get that point across. It says more about the lack of quality in little girl’s basketball leagues than the brilliance of the strategy that it worked for that one team…

David Adesnik — May 9, 2009 at 12:21 pm

I read both JVL and Sailer’s comments with interest. I’m the furthest thing from an expert about basketball, so I have no response to their points.

I notice, however, that neither JVL nor Sailer disputes the accuracy of Gladwell’s take on the junior girls team coached by Mr. Ranadive (the emphasis of my post). Perhaps it’s impossible to challenge that story, because only Gladwell has reported it.

Alternately, perhaps the full-court press really is an unorthodox strategy that can turn beginners into champions in junior girls basketball, regardless of whether it works in the NCAA or NBA.

If so, I think it illustrates an even broader point than the one you make: that a well-planned surprise is an underdog’s best chance for upset. Rather, approaching the (unspoken) rules of any game from a fresh perspective may allow an underdog to exploit the assumptions made by veteran players. That is Gladwell’s point.

Gladwell’s discussion of naval war games — brushed aside by Steve Sailer — makes the same point. A computer that was totally ignorant of war game conventions beat a whole host of experts.

One of the most overused phrased in the consultant’s dictionary is “thinking outside the box”. But Gladwell’s stories effectively illustrate what this really means. The danger of thinking outside the box is you push your conclusions too far and become trapped in a different box — which Gladwell apparently did, by deriving universal basketball strategies from what works for 12-year-old girls.

Sonny Bunch — May 9, 2009 at 1:18 pm

Definitely agree re: thinking outside the box — it’s one of the reasons I like the A-10 offense that was picking up in popularity in high school football. But yeah, using the full court press to try and prove a general point about underdogs doing well — and then pointing to Pitino’s Kentucky team(!) as well as a little league girl’s team — strikes me as almost incredibly foolish.

One Trackback

  1. [...] There has been quite a backlash against the story by Malcolm Gladwell that I praised on Thursday. [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Stay Connected

Connect With Us Via RSS, Newsletter or Your Favorite Social Networking Site.

Featured Articles

"Doublethink Online"