What is RSS? | All Feeds






Conventional Folly
Uncategorized

J Street critic to keynote J Street convention

by David Adesnik | October 8, 2009
Article Tools
Post a Comment
E-mail this Article
Print This Article
More in Uncategorized

I was pleasanly surprised to see that Rabbi Eric Yoffie will be one of the keynote speakers at the J Street convention later this month.

Rabbi Yoffie, the president of the Union for Reform Judaism, describes himself as a dove who welcomed the founding of J Street as an alternative to AIPAC. Yet when J Street equated the actions of Israel and Hamas in Gaza, Yoffie lashed out, writing,

[J Street's] words are deeply distressing because they are morally deficient, profoundly out of touch with Jewish sentiment and also appallingly naïve.

It’s saying a lot when a prominent dove echoes the standard conservative criticism of J Street.

So what will Rabbi Yoffie say at the J Street convention? Has there been a reconciliation? Have J Street’s actions since January persuaded Yoffie that he judged the organization too soon? Or did J Street actually invite an unrepentant critic to address its conference? I’m genuinely curious.

My opinion of J Street hasn’t changed. As far as I can tell from a recent NYT Magazine profile of the group, the same team is still in charge of the organziation. Since then, J Street has been rewarded with an invitation to the Obama White House. Not exactly an incentive to change.


One Comment - add your own

pabelmont — October 28, 2009 at 5:38 pm

Yoffie says “[J Street's] words are deeply distressing because they are morally deficient, profoundly out of touch with Jewish sentiment and also appallingly naïve.”

J-Street’s words are surely “profoundly out of touch” with the expressed sentiment of the leadership of official US Jewry.

They may also be “out of touch” with (majority US) (felt, not always expressed) Jewish sentiment, but I hope not. I hope that AIPAC and Rabbi Yoffie are out of touch. This is, in any event, a matter to be determined. Yoffie offers no explanation for this statement.

“[J Street's] words are * * * morally deficient” ? Yoffie doesn’t explain. In my morality, Hamas’s resisting occupation (and resisting the expulsions of 1948) is morally superior to Israel’s imposing the same; and targetting civilians (as both Hamas and Israel did) is equivalent.

And “appallingly naïve”? Only time will tell.

all told, the good Rabbi engages in a spasm of name-calling unaccompanied by reasoned analysis. One would hope for better.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Stay Connected

Connect With Us Via RSS, Newsletter or Your Favorite Social Networking Site.

Featured Articles

"Doublethink Online"