Philly Rolls Up the Blunt
Philadelphia, namesake for the famous Phillies Blunt, has banned the Philly blunt. Bill No. 060345, commonly known as the “Blunt Ban,” orders Philadelphia retail stores to remove all “blunts” and other “drug paraphernalia” from their shelves.
“It’s not just a blunt bill,” cautions Philadelphia Police detective Jerry Rocks, who worked for 14 months to get the bill enacted. “People try to weaken it by saying it just bans flavored cigars, but it’s more than that — it’s an anti-drug bill.”
The legislation prohibits selling any item “where the seller knows, or under the circumstances reasonably should know” that it would be used to “convert, produce, process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject, ingest, inhale or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance in violation of [the Pennsylvania Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act].”
The penalty for breaking the new law, which promptly went into effect after Mayor John Street signed it in January, is a fine between $300 and $1,500 for each violation. The maximum fine will rise to $1,900 in 2008 and to $2,000 in 2009.
“What we’re trying to do is let people know that it is illegal,” says Rocks. “We want store owners to know to get [paraphernalia] out of stores and off the shelves. If not, they’re going to get $1500 fines and may loose their business license.”
According to 7-Eleven spokeswoman Margaret Chabris, franchise employees are already trained to detect suspicious behavior. Their program, “Come of Age,” teaches store personnel when and how to refuse sales.
“We train them in what to look for,” said Chabris. “If they have a strong suspicion that something is being used for illegal purchases, we tell them the steps to remove the product.”
Although the Delaware County-based convenience store chain Wawa already had a self-imposed ban on rolling papers, the company voluntarily ordered its managers to pull cigars from their shelves after members of the City Council voted 17-0 in favor of the bill back in December.
“We did not ever sell many of the items covered in the bill, such as rolling papers or ‘wraps’ or other items,” said Lori Bruce, Public Relations Manager for Wawa. “We removed the products that we carried which included all single and flavored cigars and all Blunt cigars.”
Have they really?
According to the text of the bill (”… pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject, ingest, inhale…”) almost anything could be reasonably used as drug paraphernalia. The sale of sandwich bags, soda cans, apples and aluminum foil — along with litany of other household items — is potentially prohibited under the new law.
“Clearly this definition can be used to apply to almost literally anything,” notes Derek Rosenzweig, co-chair of the Philadelphia chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. “This misguided bill just continues a failed policy.”
The key, according to Jerry Rocks, is finding the “reasonable” difference between Red Delicious and something suspicious. “The average person knows what they’re selling and what it’s used for,” said Rocks. “If the $1500 fines start coming out and people start losing their business licenses, they’re going to get the paraphernalia out of their store.”
The setting for the next chapter in this story will move from City Hall to the Court House, where the legislation will almost certainly be contested. Meanwhile, as the fire burns out on city cigar sales, Altadis, U.S.A. Inc. — manufacturer of Phillies Blunts — refuses to comment.
Taylor W. Buley is author of “The Fresh Politics Reader” and is the founding editor-in-chief of the Pennsylvania Independent, a student newspaper at the University of Pennsylvania.
14 Comments - add your own
Concerned Citizen — February 12, 2007 at 12:44 pm
If you’re interested in reading the actual final language of the bill, please see http://webapps.phila.gov/council/attachments/3168.pdf.
Philadelphia residents need to start demanding accountability for failed policy. Why did the entire city council co-sponsor this bill? It makes me question their motives, especially during this election year.
tafduo — February 14, 2007 at 4:02 pm
I think proponents of this are somewhere between severely delusional and completely idiotic. The local populous should be holding these folks to task.
Do the legislators actually think that keeping people from selling pipes and paper will stop drug use?
People use drugs for good reasons, and it is the *abuse* (not use) that can cause problems. Only a few drugs are the real problem, and most ÃÂââ?ìà?illegalÃÂââ?ìÃÂàdrugs have legitimate uses - and when used appropriately, do not cause problems.
Enforcing a bill like this ADDS to the overall problems that do exist from abuse. The real problem is the most people have no honest education on what drugs are, why they can be dangerous, and how and when to use them without abusing them. To simply criminalize all the peripheral materials - people will be even MORE lost and confused. Abusers will be using more old needles, diseases will be spread more, and it will be harder to get information about what is OK - this is an unequivocal loser mentality.
retired pothead — February 16, 2007 at 5:54 pm
I think this is ridiculous. I really don’t think it’s going to do anything about marijuana use. People who like to smoke marijuana will just find other ways to smoke it. Stopping blunt sales won’t really do anything about drug sales. Drugs will always be around as long as there isn’t anything for kids to do other than get away by doing drugs.
Drug rehab — March 2, 2007 at 5:10 pm
3/2/2007 4:09:52 PM
Drug rehab
Drug rehab program — March 2, 2007 at 5:12 pm
3/2/2007 4:12:26 PM
Drug rehab program
Anonymous — March 17, 2007 at 8:41 am
fife?smithereens Bernardine notification embellishments ago phasing?charming:
walt — March 21, 2007 at 2:22 pm
another waste of legislation, a waste of tax payers money and a waste of time that could otherwise be used for me pertinent issues. Drugs all drugs should be leaglized. People do what they want and they always will. The criminal element can be greatly minimized with legalization of drugs. let grown people make their own decisons. Illicit should be treated no differently then alcohol.
walt — March 21, 2007 at 2:33 pm
education and accountability. It seems to me that if you make drugs legal the accessibility would rise and the price would fall. I doubt their is much interest in getting shot or put in jail just to make $500 a week. Drug dealing would lose all its appeal. money, danger, status
Adrian Taraba — April 12, 2007 at 12:45 pm
Wow. Even though tobacco is LEGAL it is now illegal to sell because it POSSIBLY COULD BE used for drug consumtion? Is this real?
Cops are like, “C’mon, you know what they use that for.”
And that’s enough to pass a bill.
By this logic, we should arrest every politician for accepting bribe monies.
“C’mon, you know all those dudes do that stuff. Arrest them!”
Pretty soon “looking suspicious” will be legal probable cause for search and seizure.
PEOPLE YOU ARE FORGETTING THAT YOU LIVE IN A FREE COUNTRY!
Anonymous — May 17, 2007 at 8:49 pm
splitters Pleistocene,despair authenticated reinforce physicalness
Anonymous — May 17, 2007 at 8:49 pm
splitters Pleistocene,despair authenticated reinforce physicalness
Anonymous — May 28, 2007 at 4:46 am
beauteously traverse chanced hitched abiding associator.crewing..
Anonymous — May 28, 2007 at 12:27 pm
homeless COBOL choice!maximizers loaded …
overnight delivery — May 31, 2007 at 6:07 pm
synergism mild helix solved instigators,meritoriousness clones,cavalierly