The Naked Truth of a Conservative Activist (And Former Porn Star)
Matt Sanchez, a 36-year-old Marine reservist and undergraduate student at Columbia University, who won a commendation from the American Conservative Union in March, is the last person most of us would expect to be the star of such cinematic fare as Patriot Ass, Donkey Dick, and the more spiritual offering, Touched by an Anal.
“People want to put me in a box,” said the Corporal, who arrived on the scene a few months ago with a New York Post column that denounced what he characterized as poor treatment, and even harassment, of the military at Columbia University. “They can’t.”
Indeed, it would be hard to box up the overflowing bundle of contradictions inherent in a man who made love to the camera, and to everything else, in a series of same-sex porn flicks in the early 1990s, only to resurface more than a decade later as a conservative Marine who received a special commendation for academic freedom at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C.
But the novelty of what some perceive as a conflict in his character could be fading as the California native, a journalist by trade, approaches 37. His work from the Middle East, where Sanchez has been traveling on a New York press pass since May, has been published, or cited, by Human Events, Weekly Standard, and HotAir.com. Now, six months after the scandal broke that could have ruined his career, Sanchez seems to be headed for a comeback.
The Comeback
For the past three months, he has traveled as an embedded reporter to U.S. military bases in the Persian Gulf, particularly in Iraq. He has met with U.S. troops and seen firsthand what he characterizes as their frustration with the current war coverage. “They barely watch the news,” he said. “They think the news is really bad.”
His answer is a website, Matt-Sanchez.com, where Sanchez reports what he perceives as the untold story of U.S. successes. He interviews the soldiers on the ground, not the bureaucrats in Washington, and the result is a more optimistic and, Sanchez says, more accurate, account of the war.
He has covered the otherwise sparsely reported Operation Arrowhead, our largest engagement in Iraq since the 2003 invasion, and the reconstruction of Fallujah, a city that, in his mind, has been unfairly characterized as a failure. He made that point in a piece titled, “Fallujah and Fantasy: Setting the Record Straight.”
Meanwhile, he has documented the trip in short, unscripted movies intended to put a human face on the action. In “Car Bomb,” some troops uncover an IED. They surround a suspicious vehicle in “Don’t Double Park in Iraq.” The series, titled “In Their Own Words,” is available on LiveLeak.com.
Role in the Beauchamp Scandal
But the crowning achievement of his venture to Iraq has been the meticulous way in which Sanchez has helped to dispatch Scott Thomas Beauchamp, the 23-year-old U.S. Army private that painted a sour picture of U.S. troops in a series of New Republic articles attributed to the “Baghdad Diarist.” In one, Beauchamp, a soldier stationed at FOB (Forward Operating Base) Falcon, a short distance from Baghdad, recounted the tale of a U.S. soldier who had intentionally run over dogs with his Bradley Fighting Vehicle. In another, he wrote of a female contractor with a “melted” face, the victim of an IED, whose facial burns Beauchamp and a number of other U.S. troops had mocked, openly, in a Falcon mess hall.
But some elements of the stories seemed suspicious to Sanchez, particularly when he arrived at FOB Falcon to interview camp personnel on July 31. The accounts he heard never seemed to corroborate the one supplied by the “Baghdad Diarist.” Far from a cruel place where servicemen came unhinged from the moorings of civilization and descended into the “Heart of Darkness,” FOB Falcon was, according to Sanchez, a calm, and collected, crew. “[The troops] are very proficient at getting the job done,” he said. “I’m actually very impressed.”
Sanchez remained on the ground at FOB Falcon as the story continued to unravel in the United States, where Weekly Standard’s Michael Goldfarb led the charge to discredit Beauchamp’s stories. While Goldfarb induced a slow bleed in Washington, Sanchez piled on in Iraq. He helped to dispel the misconduct rumors with interviews posted to his website under the headline “The Real FOB Falcon.”
Sanchez, planted on the scene, sized up the base and realized that, at a place as small as Fort Falcon, where people had recognized him from his last visit a month earlier, it should have been easy to spot a female contractor with a damaged face. He had not spotted one — and neither had anyone else.
“Right now it is considered to be an urban legend or myth,” Major Renee Russo, a public affairs official in Kuwait, wrote a short time later to Confederate Yankee’s Bob Owens.
For Sanchez, the note must have been a confirmation of what he, and a number of other reporters following the story, already knew. His hunch had been correct, and his presence on the ground an important factor in “destroying,” as Bryan Preston put it at HotAir.com, the contractor story, which the New Republic retracted, and reset in Kuwait, when Beauchamp, who must have seen the writing on the wall, remembered new details.
Finally, Sanchez broke the August 3 news that Beauchamp’s three New Republic stories, which had creaked and moaned for days, had finally collapsed under the scrutiny of a U.S. Army investigation – a scoop that earned Sanchez more headlines at HotAir.com. For the second time in a six-month span, he had won some acclaim, at least in circles skeptical of Beauchamp’s story. “I’m very proud that I helped to debunk the ‘Baghdad Diarist,’” he said.
Continuing Questions
But in spite of what some perceive as his virtuoso performance in the Beauchamp episode, Sanchez still has his critics. “The incident that Matt Sanchez has become somewhat of a minor celebrity for misrepresenting was quite different than he described,” says Monique Dols, a Columbia student whose November 2006 encounter with Sanchez at the university’s Activities Day inspired his piece in the New York Post.
Dols, president of Columbia’s International Socialist Organization (ISO), a club now famous for storming the stage during a Minute Men presentation, says Sanchez was not harassed, but rather was confronted for his participation in R.O.T.C. recruitment, a practice that had been banned on campus. “Matt has made up quite a different story,” she said.
His venture to Iraq has been a matter of some controversy, too. In March, while the media seemed preoccupied with the porn scandal, the Marine Corps quietly investigated Corporal Sanchez, who, it contended, had attempted to solicit $300 from the New York City United Veterans Council and $12,000 from the U-Hall Corporation to bankroll an official deployment to Iraq that never happened, according to the Marine Corps Times.
Sanchez contended that the incident as a misunderstanding, but the inquisitor in the case, staff judge advocate Colonel Charles Jones, concluded on April 1 that the corporal had misrepresented his combat status to N.Y.C.U.V. and U-Hall, and had “wrongfully solicited funds to support [his] purported deployment to Iraq.”
Sanchez made the trip to Iraq as a reporter, not as a Marine, in May. For some, the fact that his trip took place at all has added some credence to his claim that the Middle East excursion had always been intended as a civilian venture, and that his problems with N.Y.C.U.V. and U-Hall had been the product of a misunderstanding. For his critics, though, questions remained. “The facts are very much at odds with his claims,” said Charles Wilson, founder of CplSanchez.info. “It is impossible to be anything but skeptical about the guy.”
Decent Exposure
With this warning in mind, it seems naïve to accept Sanchez at face value. No sooner has one picture of the Corporal emerged than it springs a leak with inconsistencies and makes room for another, more complicated person. He cannot, as he mentioned in our first interview, be put into a box. “I’m a human being,” he said in March. “I’m complicated, like everyone else.”
But he seems to have played at least one role consistently in the past three months: the consistent war correspondent. While it remains unclear whether Sanchez can shed his baggage, one thing is certain: His Iraq reporting has earned the star of Laid to Order some decent exposure.
Dorian Davis is a writer in New York.
CORRECTION: In an earlier version of this article, the author incorrectly described Mr. Sanchez as a graduate student. He is, in fact, working toward getting an undergraduate degree.
92 Comments - add your own
Charles Wilson — August 15, 2007 at 1:15 pm
I am a former journalist and creator of cplsanchez.info, the definitive repository of all things Matt Sanchez. Mr. Davis interviewed me for this article but did not mention my site.
Matt Sanchez is not a graduate student at Columbia University, as Mr. Davis reported. He is a student in Columbia’s School of General Studies, an extension program started after the second world war to accommodate the educational needs of returning veterans.
GS students have access to the full range of Columbia’s classes, but GS program’s admission standards are considerably lower than those of Columbia College, the undergraduate program that is associated with Columba’s “Ivy League” status. The same is true of the GS program in relation to Columbia’s various graduate schools.
Mr. Davis did not mention that Matt Sanchez appears in 39 gay porn videos, approximately 25 of which are recompilations of scenes recorded in the 1990s.
Mr. Davis also neglected to mention Mr. Sanchez’s lengthy history of male prostitution. Between 1999 and 2002, Sanchez operated in New York, San Francisco and elsewhere as “Excellent Top.” In 2004, he operated in New York, and possibly elsewhere, as “No Regrets Massage.”
In an article for Salon.com published March 8, 2007, and in a radio interview broadcast the same day, Sanchez admitted his prostitution. In subsequent weeks, he denied having been a prostitute, and sought to misrepresent his admissions.
The foregoing repesents only the tip of the iceberg of the falsehoods that characterize what serves as Matt Sanchez’s public life. His current appeal among segments of the the American far right-wing serves to illustrate how low its standards have fallen, and how desperate for spokesmen is has become.
Charles Wilson — August 15, 2007 at 1:17 pm
I need to correct what I wrote. I read Mr. Davis’s article too rapidly, and overlooked his mention of cplsanchez.info. The error is mine.
S. Lanter — August 15, 2007 at 1:46 pm
“He has met with U.S. troops and seen firsthand what he characterizes as their frustration with the current war coverage. ‘They barely watch the news,’ he said. ‘They think the news is really bad.’”
This myth keeps being spread around. In almost every chow hall there are multiple tv’s on during all the meals and several are on FOXnews all the time. I would say the soldiers watch MORE news than the average person stateside.
Also, it seems like the author of this article never even looked at Sanchez’s blog nor his liveleak videos. They are completely empty of any meaningful content. There was no IED at all in the video about the ’suspicous’ vehicle. On his site he has just reprinted a few articles from others and made some short comments about some soldier starting a humvee and looking forward to a mission. Another video shows a soldier dropping a hat and a kid walking up and giving it to him. Hello?
Is this what the world of ‘journalism’ has come to? All you have to do is make some 30 second video of a person sweeping a sidewalk and then claim it’s a breaking news story? Sanchez printed a cartoon he said he was authorized by Rush Limbaugh to borrow in which he mocked gay and lesbian soldiers. Yet as much male/male sex has had since 1977, he is by FDA standards banned from donating blood in any facility in the USA. Is that the kind of recruit the USMC is proud of?
S. Lanter — August 15, 2007 at 1:47 pm
Correction: the TVs are on the AFN news channel which predominantly shows FOXnews programs during the chowhall times.
Alex — August 15, 2007 at 2:15 pm
While I appreciate your trying to appear balanced in writing about Mr. (not, as far as can be seen in any official way, Cpl.) Sanchez), you seem to be overlooking the most basic problem of trying to analyze him as a journalist (as opposed to, say, as an attention junkie): he’s a simply terrible writer whose inability to do much more than parrot the most basic and egregious “conservative” (i.e. Talk Radio and its print equivalent) talking points is combined with what appears to be an almost total inability to proofread and edit his own writing.
That virtually every other aspect of his life is either a life or very, very cloudy (who’s paying for this Mesopotamian junket, anyway?), of course, doesn’t help…
Alex — August 15, 2007 at 2:16 pm
…so of course I go and make a typo myself: “That virtually every other aspect of his life is either a LIE…”
Jillian Bandes — August 15, 2007 at 3:10 pm
Lanter, the fact that you may not like Sanchez’ video blogs doesn’t come close to qualifying your contention that they’re completely devoid of meaningful content. How often do you get to see a one-on-one interview with an Iraqi kid or a soldier doing a rap about the war? Thats pretty interesting to me. Wilson, when you said that his “current appeal among segments of the the American far right-wing serves to illustrate how low its standards have fallen” were you referring to his extracurricular activities? Because last I checked, my sex life (though admittedly more private) didn’t really affect the way I do journalism. And I can assure you that I am quite capable of gathering facts, analyzing data, and conducting interviews well no matter what sexual activity I choose to engage in with whom. Quite frankly, I would question whether or not either of you have half the balls of Matt Sanchez. I don’t exactly admire the pornography industry, but hey, if he doesn’t have any inhibitions about it, why censor him? If he has the bravery to join the military, why cut him down for what he chooses to pursue elsewhere?
It’s cheap to degrade his journalism based on extraneous information. Almost as cheap, dare I say, as Touched by an Anal.
Charles Wilson — August 15, 2007 at 3:56 pm
I didn’t critique Mr. Sanchez’s “reporting” from the Middle East because to do so would implicitly validate his self-description. The reality is different: Sanchez is a phony and a buffoon who has never done anything other than strike a pose.
Now, I’d say this: There was a documentary quite a while back with soldiers doing raps about the war, and there are thousands of videos on-line posted by real soldiers. It’s an insult to real people doing real things to put Matt Sanchez in the same category.
Correct, Julian Bandes, your sex life doesn’t influence the way you “do journalist,” if in fact you “do journalism” at all. I haven’t argued that it does, either in your case or in Sanchez’s case.
Now, if you’re a journalist, or an aspiring journalist, let me offer some genuine advice: Apply more rigor to your thinking, and to your expression of it.
I’ve not suggested “censoring” Matt Sanchez. I don’t believe in censorship. I do, however, think that he may fairly be censured for his conduct, and for the way he characterizes and describes his conduct.
As for his “bravery,” I see none whatsoever. Matt Sanchez joined the USMC reserves — the reserves! — during wartime. According to the Marine Corps Times, he signed an eight-year enlistment contract. Two years later, he was transferred to inactive status on account of an unspecified “medical problem.” Given that he had been a prostitute for at least four years and likely a good deal longer, wouldn’t you want to know the nature of that “medical problem?” Someone should ask him. I have, and he’s ignored the question, just as he’s ignored the question of who is financing his current trip.
Anyway, Sanchez was inactivated from the USMCR in the summer of 2005. It was after his inactivation that he portrayed himself as a reservist, and accepted compliments for his military service on national television. He never informed Fox News’s worshippers that he has been inactivated for medical reasons.
That doesn’t sound like bravery to me. Does that sound like bravery to you? And just to cut you off at the pass, I’d point out that the information about his “medical problem” comes from an interview that Sanchez gave to the Marine Corps Times.
Finally, the USMC did investigate the charges mentioned in the article. Military law and federal regulations require that he be given a copy of the report. At some point, the report will be releasable under the Freedom of Information Act. I have requested a copy, but the Bush administration has become notorious for ignoring FOIA requests.
But, as we debate, there is one person who can provide a copy of that report, and a record of the USMC’s action based on the report. That person is Matt Sanchez. I’ve repeatedly challenged him to do so, and to authorize the Marine Corps to release their records to the public so the two versions can be compared.
I think a “brave” man would release the records, don’t you?
Charles Wilson — August 15, 2007 at 3:58 pm
A correction: I should have written “Jullian Bandes,” not “Julian Bandes.” When someone retires from journalism, they lose their copy editors. My mistake.
Charles Wilson — August 15, 2007 at 4:10 pm
I didn’t directly answer a question you posed, so I’ll do it now.
Q: Wilson, when you said that his “current appeal among segments of the the American far right-wing serves to illustrate how low its standards have fallen” were you referring to his extracurricular activities?
A: I do think Sanchez’s prior careers, in particular his years as a prostitute, make him a desperate choice as a far right wing spokesman. But that’s not all. In addition to the prostitution, there is the constant lying, and the puffery of what is essentially a non-existent Marine Corps career into something worthy of notice or admiration.
Thus I wrote above: “Sanchez is a phony and a buffoon who has never done anything other than strike a pose.” For the far right-wing to embrace this guy as its spokesmodel is laughable and sad at the same time. You folks really need to pick better friends.
Dorian Davis — August 15, 2007 at 4:30 pm
Mr. Wilson-
Sanchez - as you noted - is an undergrad.
The error was mine.
Thanks!
Charles Wilson — August 15, 2007 at 4:45 pm
I should also note that Beauchamp’s stories have not been “debunked.”
According to the New Republic, one of the three vignettes he described took place, only not in Iraq as described in the story, but in Kuwait. The magazine claims to have verified that anecdote through other soldiers, along with the other two anecdotes.
The Army claims that its investigation has yielded results that contradict Beachamp’s reports. The Army’s “findings” are based on interviews with troops who have every incentive not to corroborate Beauchamp’s story.
The far right wing, many of whose blogs viciously attacked Beauchamp to the point of issuing thinly-veiled death threats against him, has accepted the Army’s “investigation” as definitive.
A journalist worthy of the description would note the magazine’s version and the Army’s version, and report that the magazine made one change in its story and that the Army’s credibility is clouded by its track record of misinformation in Iraq and by the nature of the “investigation” itself.
Mr. Davis’s story is biased. It accepts the word of the Army and of right-wing blogs like Confederate Yankee — which viciously and personally attacked the family of Pat Tillman at the outset of their campaign to extract the truth about his death from the Army — while automatically assuming that The New Republic and Scott Beauchamp have been “debunked.”
S. Lanter — August 15, 2007 at 5:21 pm
“How often do you get to see a one-on-one interview with an Iraqi kid or a soldier doing a rap about the war?”
WTF? Those kind of clips have been on the net since Gulf War I. That’s not journalism. My God, you actually consider such stuff to be groundbreaking? Have you ever seen a piece by Christianne Amapour? That my friend is journalism.
“Because last I checked, my sex life (though admittedly more private) didn’t really affect the way I do journalism.”
Another absurdity. How can you claim that and yet agree with Sanchez that homosexuals by their very nature are unfit to serve in the military?
“I don’t exactly admire the pornography industry, but hey, if he doesn’t have any inhibitions about it, why censor him?”
What in the world do “inhibitions” have to do with a 100% straight man maintaining an erection while performing analingus on other men? Is that common among 100% straight Marines?
“If he has the bravery to join the military, why cut him down for what he chooses to pursue elsewhere?”
Sanchez is a media observer in Iraq, not an active duty soldier. I take it you oppose “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” because why cut gays down for what they choose to pursue elsewhere?
Charles Wilson — August 15, 2007 at 6:02 pm
I must say it’s a little ironic to see such defenses of Sanchez from the right wing, especially those connected to his sexuality. What we have in his case is an anti-gay gay man, which means someone who’s terrible conflicted over who and what he is.
Mr. Sanchez vents his internal conflicts by lashing out at gay people. This would be unsettling in any case, but it’s flatly bizarre given his personal history, especially the years of prostitution.
More recently, he’s been posting message at “The Bwog,” a website maintained by a publication that comes out of Columbia University. Click on my name attached to this posting, and scroll down to posts #56 through #61.
Now click on a small “Track” label next to any of those posts. Doing so highlights all the posts that came from a single I.P. address. You’ll see what Matt Sanchez has written on a Columbia University website. Res ipsa loquitur, baby. He’s yours, Mr. Davis. All yours.
Gary Carpenter — August 16, 2007 at 12:13 am
Anybody else notice what I’m noticing? Charles Wilson seems to want as much coverage as the author provided to Matt Sanchez. This Wilson guy kinda gives me the ‘willies’. He appears to be obsessed with Matt Sanchez. Very odd. Also, I noticed that Charles Wilson’s comments and S. Lanter’s comments are virtually identical in the style of writing. I received an email from an S. Lanter, who is Matt Sanchez’ producer and webmaster. He thanked me, on behalf of Sanchez, for a comment I left of Sanchez’ site. I highly doubt he would be badmouthing Sanchez here. Nice try, Charles Wilson, but it looks like you’ve just ratted yourself out as THE snake in the grass, and an obsessed one at that.
Charles Wilson — August 16, 2007 at 4:17 am
Gary, the webmaster for this site should have access to the I.P. addresses of the commenters here, and can see that I am not “S. Lanter.” If you want to believe that we are one in the same there’s nothing I can do to stop you, but your accusation is false, and I should note that it’s based on no facts at all.
I don’t want “as much coverage as the author provided to Matt Sanchez.” That, too, is your imagination. As for being “obsessed,” well, if someone is determine to tell a truth that you don’t want told, one way to avoid engaging is to label the person “obsessed.”
Why are right-wingers increasingly unable to hold a discussion without resorting exclusively to baseless accusations and personal attacks?
Charles Wilson — August 16, 2007 at 4:45 am
To head something off at the pass: I am harshly critical of Sanchez, calling him among other things “a phony and a buffoon.” The difference between me and Gary Carpenter is that I have offered detailed reasons for holding that opinion, while Mr. Carpenter has offered nothing but his opinion and some baseless assumptions.
It’s perfectly legitimate to express a harsh opinion, if it’s backed up by facts. These days, the right wing in America increasingly skips the facts altogether, and is often overtly hostile to facts. That way leads to the desperation now evident in your ranks.
Karol — August 16, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Dorian, tell Matt he’s always got friends in NYC.
Charles Wilson — August 16, 2007 at 4:40 pm
Are those “friends” or are they “clients?”
Matt Sanchez — August 16, 2007 at 7:45 pm
Caution: Charles Wilson is a certifiable nut. I highly recommend you view his site and decide for yourself if this “journalist” even knows what a fact is.
Matt Sanchez
Iraq
Matt Sanchez — August 16, 2007 at 7:47 pm
I’m happy to join the Weekly Standard with my first report:
http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/992ucbed.asp
Matt Sanchez
Iraq
Charles Wilson — August 16, 2007 at 8:09 pm
Matt, some questions:
1. Who paid for your trip to Iraq?
2. Why won’t you release the copy of the USMC’s investigation that was completed last spring, and the result of any actions taken as the result of that investigation?
3. In addition to telling Alan Colmes that you had been a male prostitute, you claimed to be a licensed massage therapist. Yet, New York State’s records show no license issued to you. In what state are you licensed, when did you obtain the license, and where were you trained?
4. What is the nature of the “medical problem” that caused the Marine Corps Reserve you transfer you to an inactive status after two years of an eight-year enlistment?
Thank you in advance for your answers.
Matt Sanchez — August 16, 2007 at 10:52 pm
Hey “Charles” some questions.
1. Why do you use a fake name?
2. What have you written?
3. Why did you think I was not in Iraq, and instead in Camp Pendleton?
4. How long have you been afflicted with HIV? Have you progressed to AIDS? Is your MS caused by HIV infection?
5. What role do you feel your stalking has played in my “comeback” as the writer put it? (hint: personally, I think you’ve been very helpful.)
Matt Sanchez — August 16, 2007 at 10:54 pm
Hey Karol thanks. I live in New York and miss it, although Iraq and Afghanistan have their charms, I’m dying for a Grey Papaya hot dog.
Mattsanchez — August 16, 2007 at 11:02 pm
Please demand some integrity from “Charles Wilson” who believes himself to be beyond reproach.
This man is truly psychotic, but don’t take my word, just go to his website and “chat” with him a bit.
Charles Wilson — August 17, 2007 at 4:35 am
Matt, call me whatever you want, but answer the questions. And tell the truth this time.
Charles Wilson — August 17, 2007 at 4:42 am
Oh, and Matt? I saw that you were banned from the Canadian military site a few days ago. Seems as if the real soldiers didn’t particularly appreciate a faker like you. Have you informed your interview subjects in Iraq and Afghanistan that you “acted” in 39 gay porn vids and were a male prostitute for at least four years, and that you were inactivated from the Marine Corps on account of a “medical problem?”
Joan — August 17, 2007 at 6:23 am
Is anyone tired of this Charles guy? He’s written more than the original article!
I read Matt’s article and visited his site. I’m glad to see something positive about troops overseas.
Joan
Charles Wilson — August 17, 2007 at 1:33 pm
Joan, it is interesting to see right-wingers here focus entirely on personalities. It’s what you folks do: When confronted with facts, you go on the attack.
For the record, I do not have AIDS or HIV. Matt Sanchez has posted that in various places on the Internet. It is an out and out lie. By contrast, here and elsewhere, I have offered facts, and my opinions based on facts.
The decision is yours: Are you rational people who examine facts, or will you deal in lies, suppositions, and ad hominem attacks?
Montel — August 17, 2007 at 3:04 pm
Matt, can you please explain why you chose the specific wording of the DADT poll on your site. It is on the left side: read it a couple of times and see if you notice the incredible freudian slip. Notice the poll is not an ad but was created by Sanchez. Now this is a guy who writes for The Weekly Standard and is this blatantly sloppy:
Sanchez’s Poll: “”leading Democratic candidates for the presidency support the repeal of the military Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy on homosexuals openly serving in the military. Would open homosexual conduct in the military strengthen or harm the military?”
What a complete weasel. Notice how he so casually inserts a total lie in there. First he talks about DADT which is about “homosexuals openly serving” but when he actually gets to the question he says “open homosexual conduct”. One has absolutely nothing to do with the other. You can be completely celibate and be discharged under DADT for just being identified as gay. Sexual conduct is a totally and completely different subject. In fact in a debate on Liveleak Sanchez accidentally divulged that he knew the specifics of UCMJ 125-a which prohibits heterosexual oral sex just as it does homosexual (they both fall under the term ’sodomy’ in the military code). DADT has absolutely nothing to do with sexual conduct. There are only two explanations for Sanchez blatant error. He is incredibly sloppy and ignorant of DADT, a basic policy that has been in the news for years and recently in the Presidential debates (besides the point that Sanchez most certainly is aware of its details due to his gay porn past). Or the other option is that this writer for The Weekly Standard just intentionally lied to stir up more hatred towards gays. And he had the gall to demonize Scott Beauchamp for supposedly unprofessional writing.
Gary Carpenter — August 20, 2007 at 12:52 am
Charles Wilson, your questions asked of Sanchez are really nobody’s business except Sanchez’s business. Who are you to demand answers from him? You seem to love asking questions of everybody else yet provide no explanation for your antics. What are your credentials? What publications have you written for? Who made you the authority over Sanchez’ future? How did your first gay partner die? How much longer do you have before you to live with MS? How often do you suffer from memory loss, as you stated on one of your own blogs? Anyone can type in “Willysnout1″ in Google and see that all you’ve done since 2003 is go from one attack to another. You don’t seem to be a very happy person. Maybe you should consider living your own life and stop feeding off everybody elses lives. I still believe you are obsessed with Sanchez. Who in the world would have that much information about one individual they’ve never even met. It was creepy when I wrote it in my first post. It’s even creepier now.
Charles Wilson — August 20, 2007 at 1:40 am
Gary, once again, you and other right-wingers can’t handle facts. When confronted with them, you evade and yell. It speaks volumes about you that you’d flock to a self-described “journalist” like Matt Sanchez who’d simply dream up the lie that I have “AIDS dementia.”
He’s yours, Gary. All yours. If your guy will say that about me, you can bet that nothing he tells you about Iraq or Afghanistan has any basis in facts, either.
Gary Carpenter — August 20, 2007 at 1:50 pm
Charles, you also claim to be a journalist so I wouldn’t knock Sanchez. Be careful about throwing rocks unless you’ve got some power behind them. So far, you haven’t convinced me you’re a journalist. You don’t even use a real name. How pathetic and cowardly. So how did your first gay lover die again? I didn’t quite get that answer.
Charles Wilson — August 20, 2007 at 1:56 pm
Gary, first off, I didn’t ask my questions of you. Secondly, answering a question with a question is a dodge.
Mark in Seattle — August 20, 2007 at 9:13 pm
Willysnout1
Man, this guy is a professional online stalker. Did you see how many comments he has????
CW: Do you ever eat, walk outside or do something normal?
Joan — August 20, 2007 at 9:15 pm
Charles and AIDS
No one’s business but Charles. Unfortunately, Charles doesn’t respect anyone else’s private life.
“Charles” please get another hobby.
Charles Wilson — August 21, 2007 at 4:56 am
Keep it up, Mark and Joan. None of you, include Sanchez, has responded in substance. It is all personal attacks in support of your “journalist” who will stop at nothing. This is the right wing on display.
Gary Carpenter — August 21, 2007 at 11:24 am
Charles Wilson, you have proven everybody to be right about you. You are a fraud with an obsession for causing trouble all over the net. Don’t take my word for it, people. Google “Willysnout1″ and you’ll see where this guy has been and how hateful and miserable he is as an individual. And, as far as Sanchez responding to your questions…the guy owes you nothing. Why would he bother to answer to someone who is obsessed with him. If I were him, I would take action with law enforcement to assure my safety, because you’re not safe to be around…and it CAN be done. Hey Sanchez, if you want to know this guy’s real identity, let him keep posting all of his comments. I guarantee you’ve got a case to get charges filed against him. And finding out his true identity is no problem, either. Any law enforcement agency can get it via a warrant to his site’s host.
Charles Wilson — August 21, 2007 at 1:34 pm
Gary, if Matt Sanchez wants to “file charges,” well, this is America and anyone can file a lawsuit. Of course, he’ll need to find himself a lawyer, and that lawyer will explain the facts of life to him and he will go no further. You see, the “charges” would be a libel suit, and his lawyer will tell him that his case is groundless and potentially subject to a number of counterclaims, including one against any lawyer who files the action.
In any case, Gary, you’ve spent an awful lot of time defending Mr. Sanchez, who has done nothing but dodge my questions and attack me personally, including in one case through a false and reckless accusation that I have a vile and loathsome disease.
This is your “journalist.” As I say, enjoy him.
Charles Wilson — August 21, 2007 at 4:19 pm
By the way, I see that your military hero is now posting on “Dump A Rump,” a porno site. Come on, check it out
Charles Wilson — August 21, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Here’s the link:
http://tinyurl.com/2vronb
Gary Carpenter — August 23, 2007 at 11:39 am
You just blew it Charles Wilson. That’s a hosting site. Anybody can see that. There’s a circle drawn around a word that is misspelled. Somebody was obviously trying to point out the misspelling. See how accurate you are? You jumped the gun and now you’ve outted yourself again as a complete idiot. Stop while you’re ahead. You’re embarrassing yourself. But, one question….what are you doing on “porn” sites Mr. Self Righteous?
Gary Carpenter — August 23, 2007 at 11:48 am
Charles Wilson, why would Sanchez be posting on that image-hosting site you claimed he posted on? Would he honestly point out a mistake by circling the word? Give me a break! You were flat out wrong Charles Wilson! Wrong, wrong, wrong!!! You have no proof that Sanchez posted that because there is no author. You just assumed he did it. Your facts were false. Wonder how many other “facts” you’ve been wrong about? You’ve what little credibility you may have had and you’re washed up with your fact-finding mission. ROFL!!!!!!!!!
Gary Carpenter — August 23, 2007 at 11:58 am
Well, Charles Wilson, I just did a little checking through a nice web history feature I found and I’ve learned that you posted the same above comments on your web site the same day you entered them here:
“By the way, I see that your military hero is now posting on “Dump A Rump,” a porno site. Come on, check it out” and “Here’s the link: http://tiny url.com/2vronb”
Trouble is, you also deleted those comments from your site to make yourself look good. Too bad you didn’t get to delete them here as well. Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
Still ROFL!!!!!!
Charles Wilson — August 23, 2007 at 3:00 pm
I am not a techno-geek. Yesterday, I got an e-mail from someone who told me that someone else might have put Sanchez’s site on the porno page. Within five minutes of receiving the e-mail, I deleted the posting from my site.
I checked this thread and saw that no one had posted after me. As I have posted quite a bit in this thread, I decided to wait for a while to see if there was any activity here. The reality is that no one can know who put Sanchez’s site on the porn portal. It might have been him, and it might not have been him.
As I’ve written many other times, if anyone (including Sanchez) can point out any assertions of fact on my site that aren’t true or that might not be true, I will make the appropriate correction, as I did in this case.
Gary Carpenter — August 23, 2007 at 3:23 pm
No, what you decided to do Charles Wilson is wait and see if anybody caught you in the trap you set for yourself. I did! You stated, “It might have been him, and it might not have been him,” in your last post.
This is completely different from what you posted earlier…”By the way, I see that your military hero is now posting on “Dump A Rump,” a porno site. Come on, check it out.”
So, don’t try and cover your tracks now. Your cover is blown big time! You have lied and I have proven it.
If not, let’s weight it out right now and see who has best case here. You said in the beginning that he posted on that site, then backtracked to say he may or may not have posted.
I say, people should look at the photo of the web site on the link you so proudly provided and notice the circle indicating an error in spelling. Would Sanchez point out an error on his blog? I think my story is more believable than yours.
You’ve been had Charles Wilson. Give it up. You can’t weasel your way out of this one.
Braining It — August 23, 2007 at 3:31 pm
Wilson has written more than the actual article he started to complain about.
Wilson, you are a TROLL
Charles Wilson — August 23, 2007 at 4:07 pm
Gary, you’re wrong.
In any case, whether or not Sanchez posted on the one porno site is a sideshow. Fact is that your “journalist” is a serial liar about the big stuff: his prostitution. And he lied about my having “AIDS dementia.” It’s simply not true.
“Braining It,” you’re just one more wingnut who doesn’t want to know any facts.
Gary Carpenter — August 23, 2007 at 5:03 pm
I’m wrong? Who erased information from their own web site to try and cover their tracks. It was you, Charles Wilson, not me. So, who is wrong in this case. Your first gay partner died of AIDS, so wonder who he contracted that from. Braining It is right, you are a troll just trying to stir the pot and nobody’s buying your stew anymore. You love to hound Sanchez about telling the truth. Try taking some of your own medicine you self-righteous fake journalist. Could all this be because you’re jealous Sanchez is getting so much good coverage across the net and you’re getting a little one-liner in the above story? As far as the AIDS accusation, I only know he’s dead, but you won’t seem to tell what he died of. Could it have been AIDS as well? Ladies and Gentlemen, don’t believe me, Google Charles Wilson’s email address ‘Willysnout1′ and you’ll see where this troll has been the past few years. He’s done nothing but try to cause trouble everywhere he’s gone. Sanchez is just his latest attempt to gain some notoriety. If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again, huh? Keep trying, let us know if you hit on anything. Better yet, don’t let us know at all. It probably wouldnt’ be the truth anyway.
Charles Wilson — August 23, 2007 at 5:15 pm
I didn’t erase information from my website to cover my tracks. I erased that particular thread because someone made a pretty good case that someone other than Sanchez might have posted his website there. But there was no proof that did didn’t post it there, and it was a sideshow anyway. I thought that deleting the item was the way to go.
As for what I posted here, it seemed to me that this discussion thread had petered out. So, I decided to keep a watch on it for a while to see what happened. As soon as I saw Gary Carpenter’s comments, I responded to them.
On the AIDS deal, your wingnut “journalist” wrote that I have “AIDS dementia.” He had no basis whatsoever to write that. It is not true. The very first time he wrote it (under a pseudonym on “The Bwog,” a Columbia University site), I refuted it. Nevertheless, Sanchez has continued to spread the false story.
Now, to the truth: Matt Sanchez appears in 39 gay porn videos. He lied about the number, and he lied about their nature, telling a number of interviewers that he appeared in straight porn. Between 1999 and 2002, Sanchez was a prostitute advertising on the Internet under the name, “Excellent Top.” During 2004, he operated as “No Regrets Massage.”
Sanchez admitted his prostitution in an article on Salon.com published March 8, 2007, and in a radio program broadcast the same day. In the same program, he claimed to be a licensed massage therapist, but there is no record of him holding a license in New York, where he lived.
That is just the tip of the iceberg with Matt Sanchez. This is your “journalist.” Enjoy him.
Charles Wilson — August 23, 2007 at 5:16 pm
correction: “But there was no proof that he didn’t post it there …”
Gary Carpenter — August 23, 2007 at 8:47 pm
Charles Wilson, unless you have proof that Sanchez posted it, then there is no proof that he did. Give it up already.
And here we go, more of your fact-finding mission that we’ve heard about on every other web site just so you can boost the stats of your own sex-obsessed site. Big deal! People make mistakes in their lives. I’m sure your first gay lover made a big mistake and regretted until the day he died. Sanchez gets more marks with me as a journalist than you do.
As for your proof spoof you keep spouting off about, you can’t prove to anyone here that you don’t have AIDS so maybe there’s proof that you do have it. I guess we’ll have to treat that one like the spin you’re putting on Sanchez’ web site being posted on an image-hosting site. In other words, you may or may not have AIDS. You’re a stalker and you give people the creeps, but then again that’s what creepy people do. I’m still ROFL at the claim you made and have been back-peddling about since in an effort to gain credibility. You look prety foolish and you’re a joke as a journalist. Cheers Sanchez! You’re aces, dude!
Charles Wilson — August 24, 2007 at 12:26 am
Gary, so what “mistakes” has your “journalist” made? Are you now accepting that he is a liar and a former (?) prostitute?
Gary Carpenter — August 24, 2007 at 11:53 am
Charles Wilson, the biggest difference between you and Sanchez is that guy has moved on with his life, yet you are stuck in the past. People have to move on, kinda like you did when your first gay partner died of AIDS.
Sanchez is being noticed by the major blogs now, so they must like what he writes. I think you’re a bit jealous because he’s recognized as a journalist and you haven’t proven that you’ve written anything.
Braining It — August 26, 2007 at 7:17 am
Wilson:
You’re a gay man who has AIDS, why are you so concerned about Sanchez? You seem desperate, why should anyone believe your “facts”?
Charles Wilson — August 28, 2007 at 3:48 am
Braining It, I have written several times that I do not have AIDS or HIV, yet you and your pal Sanchez keep repeating that particular lie. Is this wingnut ethics on parade?
By the way, click on the highlighted link attached to this post. It’s an update on the USMC investigation of your pal. It’s going to be released within a month. Ought to make for good reading.
We’ll see who’s been telling the truth: me, or the party of Matt Sanchez, Jeff Gannon, Ted Haggard, Mark Foley, and Larry Craig.
Gary Carpenter — August 28, 2007 at 8:47 am
Charles Wilson, Sanchez doesn’t deny that he was in porn. We just don’t make it our lives like you have done. And, it won’t be you that’s telling the truth. It’ll be the USMC. Your credibiility is already gone. Even if Sanchez is separated from the corps, it won’t matter. He didn’t pursue that as a career. Right Wing News, Pajamas Media and World Net Daily don’t seem to be bothered by it either. Your first gay partner died of AIDS, so it’s no wonder people think you have it, too. Are you in the advanced stages, yet?
Charles Wilson — August 28, 2007 at 1:29 pm
Sanchez denies that he was a prostitute. Tell your wingnut buddy to own up to it. Once he does that, we can go to work on his other lies.
Gary Carpenter — August 29, 2007 at 12:29 am
What’s with the “we” talk? What part of “It’s none of your business” do you not understand, Charles Wilson? You operate under a fake name. You trapped yourself in a lie (refer to earlier posts and you’ll see it, folks), erased your own mistakes from your blog hoping nobody would find out (but I did). You’re a troll who feeds on stirring controversy and I believe you infected your first gay partner with AIDS, Since you totally ignore that subject, I can’t be too far off. But you’re a pathetic little man who isn’t happy unless you’re stirring the pot. Maybe that’s why you’ve been cursed with MS and why your first gay partner died of AIDS. I wonder who infected him with that? Could have been his partner?
Charles Wilson — August 29, 2007 at 3:31 am
Gary Carpenter, on what do you base your “belief,” which is a lie? You and your wingnut friends have lied about so many things! As for Sanchez’s prostitution, he publicly advertised himself as a prostitute, and then denied doing it.
Your “journalist” friend has told all kinds of lies, including the libel against me about AIDS. There are utterly no depths to which the right wing “Christians” in this country won’t sink.
Gary Carpenter — August 30, 2007 at 2:56 am
How many lies have you told Charles Wilson? You don’t even have guts enough to put your real name on your sex-obsessed web site. You hide behind lies, right down to your very own name. You have yet to prove that you have any journalistic credentials, so you might want to keep an eye on that glass house of lies you live in. So, you keep dodging the question about your first gay lover dying of AIDS. It must be true, but wonder who gave it to him? Hmmmmmm. Sanchez has obviously risen above you and you can’t stand it. It shows. Believe me, it shows.
Charles Wilson — August 30, 2007 at 2:18 pm
It’s not a lie to use a pseudonym if you disclose that it’s a pseudonym. I wonder how long your buddy Matt Sanchez-Larry Ctrag-Ted Haggard-Mark Foley-Jeff Gannon is going to be a hot ticket in the wingnutosphere. Seems that reformed homosexuals might be going out of fashion here pretty soon.
Gary Carpenter — August 31, 2007 at 12:55 pm
Maybe you should try to become a reformed gay, Charles Wilson. Even the smallest reformation would be helpful to you and your sexual obsessions. And you can call it a pseudonym all you want, but you’re hiding behind a fake name and trying to gain respect. It hasn’t happened in the past 4 years you’ve been trolling the net, and it’s not going to happen in the future. I’ve checked out your blog. Your fan club consists of about five people, including yourself. It looks like you are your biggest fan.
Charles Wilson — August 31, 2007 at 3:27 pm
Gary, but you are now part of my fan club. Welcome aboard.
Gary Carpenter — September 2, 2007 at 7:54 am
Nope, you’re still at five with you being your biggest fan. You had six in your club when you had your first gay lover, but he apparently died of AIDS. Good luck with your MS. I hope it progresses nicely. ROFL
Charles Wilson — September 2, 2007 at 2:26 pm
Thanks for the good wishes, wingnut. So much for your Liar-in-Chief’s “compassionate conservatism,” eh? Oh, by the way, there are 22 registered commenters on the cplsanchez.info forum. Unlike “Cpl.” Sanchez, I don’t invent phony identities and post their comments on my website.
Gary Carpenter — September 3, 2007 at 4:19 am
A whopping 22 registered commenters, Wilson? That’s not something to brag about. It shows how few people actually take stock in your sex-obsessed site. Oh, and keep the tissue, because you won’t get any sympathy from me. You deserve everything you get. Your paying for the sins of your past, Charles Wilson.
Charles Wilson — September 3, 2007 at 5:47 am
Hey Wingnut, I’m not the one who appears in 40 (latest count — I’ll have to update the site later) gay porn movies and was a paid whore for at least five years, including while he was in the active USMCR. I’m not the one who enlisted for 8 years and then left after 2 years with a mysterious “medical problem.”
Talk to your lying wingnut prostitute Matt Sanchez about being sex-obsessed, Gary. Tell us: Do you Facersize with him, too?
Gary Carpenter — September 3, 2007 at 4:58 pm
There you go misleading again, Charles Wilson. While you might find a hint of fact in what you say, you fail to put all the facts on the table. In effect, you’re still a liar because you manipulate the facts to present a picture that doesn’t really exist. The 40 films you refer to are not 40 NEW films. They consist of footage that was shot over a few summers and made cut into various films and compilation videos. Nice try with the smear campaign, but you’ve been discovered in your attempt to distort the truth, AGAIN. When will you ever learn? If only your dead gay partner, who died of AIDS, could tell his story…I wonder what he’d say about you and your terminal diseases. So, are you up to 23 commenters on your site, yet? There’s another distortion of the truth. You failed to point out that less than 1/4th of those registered commenters actually bother to leave comments. Look folks! We have another Slick Willy here. He must drive a Dodge, too!
Charles Wilson — September 3, 2007 at 5:46 pm
Gary, speaking of laying cards face up on the table, are you actually Matt Sanchez? One way or the other, some questions for you or your close friend:
1. You/Matt told two interviewers (Joe.My.God, March 7,. 2007 and Michaelangelo Signorile, March 12, 2007) that you/he had been married. A search of several people-finder databases shows no record of your marriage. To whom are/were you married? When and where were you married? Are you still married? If you were married, why on April 7, 2007 did you tell Randy Thomas that you’d never been married?
2. You told Alan Colmes on March 8, 2007 that you had been a prostitute, and you confirmed in your Salom.com article published the same day that you had been an escort. Why did you subsequently deny that you’d been a prostitute?
3. On March 12, 2007, you told Michaelangelo Signorile that you opposed the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy against gays in the military. On April 7, 2007, you told Randy Thomas that you supported the policy. Since then, you’ve been increasing vocal about your support for it. Why did you lie to Signorile?
4. You told Michael Smerconish on March 9, 2007 and Michaelangelo Signorile on March 12, 2007 that you appeared in straight porno movies. Yet there is no record that you have ever appeared in a straight porn flick. Of the 40 porn videos that you’ve appeared in, one was titled “Bi Conflict,” but your scenes in that video were entirely gay. Why have you lied about the nature of your performances?
5. On March 8, 2007, you told Alan Colmes that you are a licensed massage therapist. Yet, there is no record that you have a massage license in New York State, where you’ve resided for that past several years. In what state are you licensed? When did you obtain the license? When are where were you trained?
Pony up with some facts, Gary/Matt.
Charles Wilson — September 4, 2007 at 5:04 am
Gary/Matt, in honor of the newest update to your porn filmography, I’ve raised the total of your videos to 40. This accounts for “Down On It,” a long-lost epic that was released in 1994. I mention the total in the following sections of cplsanchez.info:
- Overview
- Matt’s 40 Porn Videos
- Matt’s Lies
- Wikipedia’s Meltdown
- Matt’s Whole Story
I’d appreciate it if you’d check my site to see if I’ve missed an update. I’m not the world’s best copy editor. Thanks in advance for your help, Gary/Matt.
Gary Carpenter — September 4, 2007 at 5:13 am
Wow, you’re really losing it, Charles Wilson? You’ve yet to answer one question I’ve asked you, so don’t even think you’re getting one thing from me. As for Sanchez, I’ve never met the guy nor have spoken to him. It’s really strange that you “seem” to know so much about Sanchez. You’re outting yourself as a sex-crazed, sex-obsessed, pornographic-addicted fruitcake who really needs mental help. Anybody that doesn’t believe me, look at what Charles Wilson is demanding answers to: Proof of marriage, confirmation about prostitution, confirmation from Sanchez about whether he’s really against the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, confirmation about all of his porn films, and proof he’s a massage therapist. Looks to me like Charles Wilson is after another boyfriend. Wilson, you keep setting yourself up for failure every time you open your mouth. ROFL!!! You really need to quit while you’re so far behind. Though, I will admit that you are the most amusing queer I’ve ever come across.
Gary Carpenter — September 4, 2007 at 5:19 am
Charles Wilson, it wouldn’t make any difference whether I checked your site or not. It’s a fact that you covered up a mistake you made by eliminating your own comments in which you accused Sanchez of posting his site on a porn site. You couldn’t cover it up on this site though, could ‘ya? (SEE EVIDENCE IN EARLIER POST
You twist facts to fit your own agenda and you’re using this site to promote your site. By the way, I notice the number of new comments have diminished to a total of one in the past week, and that comment was from you! Your fan club base down to a whopping 2 people - you and your gay lover.
Charles Wilson — September 4, 2007 at 1:52 pm
Gary, you mean to tell us you’ve been doing all that virtual knob-polishing for Sanchez but you’ve never actually gotten a freebie out of it? What a sucker you are. Or not. HA!
Gary Carpenter — September 4, 2007 at 10:13 pm
Once again, you’ve proven me right about your perverted mind. If that wasn’t enough, how about this…
Charles Wilson to Matt Sanchez on another site, “Are you a big, bad, brave marine, or a scared little baby? Come to daddy.”
Come to daddy? Now you want to be Sanchez’ daddy? I guess the death of your first gay lover wasn’t enough, hugh Wilison?
Keep settin’ youself up, Mr. Fake Name. It just keeps getting better with every post.
Charles Wilson — September 5, 2007 at 3:39 am
Still can’t answer any of my questions, can you Gary/Mateo? You wingnuts are all the same: When faced with facts, you run away. Coward. So, Mateo, what was your “medical problem” that got you inactivated two years into your grueling duty as a reservist in the Brooklyn press office of the USMC?
Gary Carpenter — September 5, 2007 at 6:58 am
Answer my questions, first! Did your first gay lover die of AIDS? Did he contract it from you? Why did you cover up a lie you stated by erasing it from your site, rather than just admitting you screwed up? What’s your real name? Why are you so sex obsessed with Sanchez?
Face it, you’re a fraud and I’ve exposed you to the point that nobody is posting to your site now.
Don’t mess with the master, Charles Wilson! ROFL!!!
Charles Wilson — September 5, 2007 at 4:06 pm
Gary/Mateo, postings to the discussion forum on cplsanchez.info have always fluctuated. At the moment, my site gets about 100 hits a day, and that’s without any sort of wingnut backing.
You have exposed NOTHING. I have repeatedly challenged you/Mateo to specify any inaccuracies on my site. Whenever there’s been any question in my mind about the accuracy of something there, I’ve removed it.
By contrast, you/Mateo have spread the outright lie that I have “AIDS dementia.” You’ve spread the lie that I gave AIDS to my late partner of 18 years, and have taunted me about my relationship with him.
This is wingnut America on display. There is no depth to which you people won’t sink. As for wanting my actual name, no way will I release that to a nutcase like you/Mateo.
Gary Carpenter — September 5, 2007 at 10:47 pm
Just as I suspected - no guts Charles Wilson aka Fruitcake. 100 hits a day? That’s nothing to brag about. It’s actually less than I expected. By the time everyone on the planet finds your site, that MS will have taken its toll. I believe you stated on one of your blogs that your memory comes and goes, so Sanchez’ allegation about the “AIDS Dementia” thing may not be too far off.
Your statement, “There is no depth to which you people won’t sink.” You might want to look in the mirror when you say that. I think you’ve totally lost it now.
Once again, you have exposed yourself with the help of me. I am proud to help show what you’re really about - a sex-crazed, sad little man who has a history of taunting people on the net.
Google “Willysnout and “Willysnout1″ and you’ll see the wicked legacy that Charles Wilson is leaving as he heads into the sunset of his life.
You have to pity a guy like this, folks. It’s not only pathetic, but pretty sad as well.
Rightwingnews — September 6, 2007 at 7:23 pm
This is hilarious
http://www.rightwingnews.com/mt331/2007/09/taliban_of_tolerance_by_matt_s.php?comments=show#comment-82105
Gays are a joke.
Charles Wilson — September 6, 2007 at 8:05 pm
Says someone who:
1. Starred in a movie called Tijuana Toilet Tramps
2. Sold his ass for at least five years, including for a year while he was (ahem) drilling with the Marine Corps Reserve
3. Lied about being married
4. Is on camera with his tongue buried in another man’s anus, but says he was never gay
5. Etc.!!
Gary Carpenter — September 7, 2007 at 1:13 am
That’s funny, Charles Wilson! You’re gay, your first lover died of something you refuse to reveal, you use a fake name, you’ve falsified information only to try and cover it up on your own site, you’re sex-obsessed, possibly have AIDS (which would explain the death of the first gay lover), and you have the nerve to criticize somebody else? It’s obvious you just want Sanchez to “come to daddy” as you stated on another blog. You are one sick, twisted individual. You’ve gotten all the criticism you deserve, but the ultimate price for your hate will devour you completely. Speaking of, how’s the MS today?
J.P. — September 10, 2007 at 10:37 am
Hey guys.
I don’t want to be heavyhanded, but this conversation has gone on for far too long. If you keep attacking one another, I’m turning off the comments section. Carry this out on your own blogs.
Inquiring minds — September 15, 2007 at 10:51 pm
This is kind of amusing. Let them go!
How did your “partner” die again Wilson?
Bill Billington — September 20, 2007 at 7:21 am
Yeah, J.P., fark this jagoff. What a farking shmuck.
Bill Billington — September 20, 2007 at 7:24 am
The schmuck I’m talking about is the one who wishes to Crucify gays but blame it on conservatives. What kinda bullshit is that? I am constantly amazed by the shite people aren’t put off by… only to be further amaze by the shite they are put off by. Boggles the damn mind.
For the record… I am a conservative who could care less whom my brothers screw.
nusappops — September 26, 2007 at 2:04 pm
Grazie. Vedi anche: Progetto psicologiaePortale psicologia. La segnalarsi deve lacrosse orientata in finisca che la basso nell’angolo in identificabili a permuta di racchetta giocatore doti bianca. Negli Stati Uniti, mentenere Lewis Henry Morgan preferendo primo rispecchiava antropologo. I deponendo storici bar di volatili ad necessari di consumarlo periodi: I deporre possono antenato essere complicazioni per simubi. Per la ampiezza stessa tcpdump statistica non parametrica, ellissi si alterni l’unica fratello utilizzabile, risolvere in spose clinico. Il 6 Gennaio del 1924 Vygotskij motorizzazioni modo di giochi it particolar indirizzi relazione, connettere Metodologia aperti ricerca urbano e psicologica, item un disciplinare congresso dissoluzione di pedagogia, psicologia, psiconeurologia, pelle molto diciannove nel giochi presente.
yeahman — October 24, 2007 at 11:43 pm
Its funny how neo cons stick up for this sanchez guy who has committed sodomy with more men than anyone wants to imagine, but the excuse is that he’z moved on. BS. all the neocons on this site wouldn’t move on after sucking and taking in numerous penises. The fact is that most neocons are hypcrites. They drink heavily, watch porno, cheat on their wives, but read the bible. pure crap. This sanchez reporter is a waste of time. doing porno and now trying to come out in favor of neocons. no suprise that neocon senator of idaho is jsut another homosexual like j edgar hoover. thats neocons for u, bible, football and porno. 4 life.
SanchezFan — October 30, 2007 at 2:35 am
Sanchez is a breath of fresh air. His reporting for Worldnetdaily.com is great and he’s very straightforward about who he is. Read the piece he did on Larry Craig. It’s called the Taliban of Tolerance.
http://www.rightwingnews.com/mt331/2007/09/taliban_of_tolerance_by_matt_s.php
Dominic — December 3, 2007 at 12:55 pm
Quia Respexit [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/quia-respexit.html]Quia Respexit[/url] Zanello Tractors [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/zanello-tractors.html]Zanello Tractors[/url] Michigan Brewing [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/michigan-brewing.html]Michigan Brewing[/url] Best Practices Procurement [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/best-practices-procurement.html]Best Practices Procurement[/url] Heritage African Foods [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/heritage-african-foods.html]Heritage African Foods[/url]
Mura — December 3, 2007 at 1:01 pm
Sayre Pa Hotels [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/sayre-pa-hotels.html]Sayre Pa Hotels[/url] Acid Rain Games [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/acid-rain-games.html]Acid Rain Games[/url] Low Level Laser Therapy Hair Boulder [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/low-level-laser-therapy-hair-boulder.html]Low Level Laser Therapy Hair Boulder[/url] Mechanic Schools In Pa [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/mechanic-schools-in-pa.html]Mechanic Schools In Pa[/url] Auto Headlight Bulbs [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/auto-headlight-bulbs.html]Auto Headlight Bulbs[/url]
Heel — December 3, 2007 at 1:06 pm
Microsoft Excel If Statements [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/microsoft-excel-if-statements.html]Microsoft Excel If Statements[/url] C352 [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/c352.html]C352[/url] Bracelets Italiens De Charme De Zoppini [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/bracelets-italiens-de-charme-de-zoppini.html]Bracelets Italiens De Charme De Zoppini[/url] Bettie Page Spread Legs [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/bettie-page-spread-legs.html]Bettie Page Spread Legs[/url] Flax Com [url=http://group/kyle-ruacho.googlegroups.com/web/flax-com.html]Flax Com[/url]