Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

August 26, 2008

Independence for Abkhazia and South Ossetia?

By: James Poulos

A reliable source sends me a flash message at this early hour: the Russians have recognized them. Quite a silly think to do for a rampaging imperial power that could easily have just absorbed the little territories. Though I’m sure the reaction in the US will be this is absorption in all but name. I wonder what the reaction will be in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Wait, no I don’t.

These two statelets are problems Georgia has never been able to resolve, and we must remember going forward that they are not the mere creations of Moscow. They have had a few colorable claims to sovereignty as it is — probably Abkhazia’s being the stronger one — and from a plain perspective, if the model of defusing conflict by breaking up states containing very restive enclaves was right in Yugoslavia, it is probably right in Georgia, too — and was before the Russians came. Debacliciously, had the West pressed Georgia to let those statelets go, we’d be in a far different and better situation today.

So for reasons like those I think Western recognition of the pair should be swift, accompanied with a statement making it clear HOW and WHY recognition can be conferred for reasons other than the force situation on the ground. Indeed, recognition affords the West a powerful opportunity to explain to Russia that once you play this game, you must play it fair, i.e. both statelets must not become mere Russian garrison states. Sure, there will be bases. But we know how this works; we know the difference between Qatar and Kosovo. Abkhazia and South Ossetia have been stubborn obstacles to the normalization of the international system in Georgia, in a way that makes it extraordinarily difficult and even moot to ascribe fault. The main obstacle to integration, in my view, was our alliance with Georgia, and our desire to bolster Saakashvili’s regime. Now it strikes me that that obstacle, too, is pretty moot: the best way to keep Saakashvili in power (as shaky as he is, the alternative is probably worse) is to help a consolidated Georgia, free of fiercely independent ‘autonomous’ regions that it never could recapture, press the Russians back to internationally recognized borders, new and old, through a series of intense diplomatic moves (i.e. more sticks than carrots. But please use sticks the Russians care about, and not ones that will damage our own institutions, like the G8).

UPDATE: the wire report.