Defining victory downwards in Afghanistan? Not yet.

Newsweek called Afghanistan Obama’s Vietnam. Conservatives made the argument for victory.

Barack Obama made a significant decision and chose to send an additional 17,000 troops to Afghanistan. I won’t call it a hard decision, but it was certainly the right one, so the President deserves credit for that.

Still, the President cautioned the dispatch of additional troops would not prejudice the outcome of the comprehensive strategic review being conducted by his administration. Then, last night, Richard Holbrooke refused to say that Obama’s goals were any different from Bush’s:

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, Mr. Ambassador, the Bush administration’s stated goal in Afghanistan was roughly to keep al-Qaida out and to try to build a democratic government. How is the Obama administration goal in Afghanistan different?

RICHARD HOLBROOKE: Well, broadly stated, the way you defined it, it falls within the same framework as any American government would do, particularly one inheriting the very difficult situation which President Obama inherited in the last month.

It took a lot more words than necessary, but the basic message is that the goals are the same. I hope it stays that way.